Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20241:21-cv-01461California6,623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-NODJ-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS TO COMPEL

v. (ECF Nos. 90, 98, 99) C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s three separate motions to compel, filed on June 2, 2023 and June 15, 2023, respectively. (ECF Nos. 90, 98, 99.) I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 48.) On November 22, 2022, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 59.) On June 2, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.