Olfati

Olfati v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20242:22-cv-01127California999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Parvin Olfati, No. 2:22-cv-01127-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Parvin Olfati moves to amend the scheduling order to allow the parties to file 18 discovery-related motions after the current deadline for fact discovery, now set to end on February 1, 2024. See generally Admin. Mot., ECF No. 29. She proposes a new deadline of June 17, 2024. /d. at 1. Defendants oppose the motion. See generally Opp’n, ECF No. 30. As explained in this order, Olfati has shown good cause to amend the scheduling order. The motion 22 is granted. Olfati alleges the Sacramento County Sheriff and other county employees retaliated 24 against her for filing police reports, among other related allegations. See, e.g., Joint Status Report 25 at 2-7, ECF No. 21 (summarizing allegations). She filed her original complaint in state court in October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.