Labbe'

Labbe' v. Dometic Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20242:20-cv-01975California4,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANE LABBE, et al., No. 2:20-CV-1975-DAD-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DOMETIC CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this products liability action against Dometic Corporation. Pending before the Court is a motion for reconsideration of the prior discovery order. ECF No. 101. Defendant filed an opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply and declaration in support of their motion. ECF Nos. 102, 104, 105. The parties gave oral argument at a hearing on the matter. ECF No. 107. This Court previously held that the sought material, Dr. Buc’s testing and the NHTSA drafts, were protected by attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. ECF No. 92. Plaintiffs now request the Court perform an in camera review of the material to determine whether it is appropriately shielded from discovery. ECF No. 101 at 2. Plaintiffs also contend that even if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.