Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH RAY HARRIS, No. 2:23-00581-DJC-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANISE ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 28, 2023, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 18. The motion included notice to plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). Despite being granted an extension of time to do so, plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any…