(PC) Boland v. Second Watch Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 20241:23-cv-01019California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL BOLAND, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01019-JLT-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS AND

SECOND WATCH OFFICER, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 13)

16 Plaintiff Daniel Boland Stevens seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute by failing to keep the Court apprised of his current address. (Doc. 13.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id. at 4.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.