Flores

(PC) Brown v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20242:23-cv-02487California290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAMEED J. BROWN, No. 2:23-cv-02487-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FLORES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 By order filed December 22, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Plaintiff has consented to this court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.