(PC) Mitchell v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20241:23-cv-00062California582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, No. 1:23-cv-00062-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

v. (ECF No. 39) C. GONZALES, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff John Edward Mitchell is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for judicial notice, filed January 29, 2024. (ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice of Title 15 of the California Code of Regulations sections 3084.9 and 3085. (Id.) Per Federal Rule of Evidence 201, a court may take judicial notice of an adjudicative fact if it “is not subject to reasonable dispute because it (1) is generally known within the court's territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” Rule 201, however, deals only with adjudicative facts. See Lindland v. TuSimple,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.