CDCR

(PC) Diaz, II v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20241:23-cv-01378California4,803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY EDWARD DIAZ, II No. 1:23-cv-01378-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION CDCR, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

Defendants. ACTION (ECF No. 13) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on September 15, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On November 17, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the November 17, 2023 order. Therefore, on January 2, 2024, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.