Thomas

Thomas v. Soeun

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20242:23-cv-01070California525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY THOMAS, Case No. 2:23-cv-01070-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE VEUN SOEUN d/b/a PINOY ASIAN

MARKET,

15 Defendant.

17 18 The court previously issued an order setting an initial scheduling conference for February 1, 2024, and directing the parties to file status reports by no later than January 18, 2024. ECF No. 7. To date, neither party has filed a status report. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. Failure to comply with the court’s Local Rules or court orders “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case or entering a party’s default, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.