Hill

(PC) Moore v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20242:22-cv-00758California5,362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNI ALFRED MOORE, No. 2:22-cv-0758 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. I. Findings and Recommendations By findings and recommendations filed December 28, 2023, the undersigned recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiff’s failure to notify the court of his current address. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff has now filed objections stating that he has been moved three times in a four-month period and believes that he did submit a change of address. ECF No. 13. In light of plaintiff’s clear intention to proceed with the case, the findings and recommendations will be withdrawn, and the undersigned will proceed to screen the complaint. The court notes that plaintiff’s objections do not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.