Jenkins

(PC) Luevano v. Jenkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20242:22-cv-00091California9,725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE LUEVANO, No. 2:22-cv-0091 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ANTHONY JENKINS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ fully briefed motion for summary judgment based on exhaustion of administrative remedies is before the court. As discussed below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion be granted. I. Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint, in which plaintiff alleges that on March 16, 2021, at Mule Creek State Prison, defendants Jenkins, Janam and Bickle used excessive force on plaintiff. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff also included his own declaration. (ECF No. 1 at 8-14.) //// 27 On June 9, 2022, plaintiff consented to dismissal of defendants Griffin and Parker, who were dismissed on June 15, 2022. (ECF Nos. 10 &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.