Rojas

(PC) Martinez v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20241:16-cv-01467California3,157 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTONIO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:16-cv-01467-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (ECF No. 52) ROJAS,

Defendant.

15 Plaintiff Antonio Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendant RN Rojas for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 76.) On September 10, 2019, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust his available administrative remedies with respect to the allegations asserted in this action. (ECF No. 52.) Following multiple extensions of time, Plaintiff filed his opposition on March 30, 2020. (ECF No. 68.) Defendant’s reply was filed on April 2, 2020. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.