Hernandez

(PC) Hammler v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20241:19-cv-00616California1,345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00616 SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER –

NOTICE AND WARNING REGARDING

v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. HERNANDEZ, MOTION

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Allen Hammler is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 17 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim for 18 a violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment as alleged in the second amended 19 complaint. (Doc. 26.) The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. (Doc. 20 55.)

I. RAND NOTICE

22 Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on January 30, 2024. (Doc. 77.) 23 Defendants’ Notice of Motion states it includes “the Rand notice.” 1 (Id. at 2.) However, a review 24 of the motion by the Court reveals it does not include a Rand notice or warning.2 Therefore, the 25 Court hereby notifies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.