Molina
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Molina
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-01553-NODJ-CDB
COMPANY,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER TO DEPOSIT INTERPLEADER FUNDS v. PURSUANT TO FED. R CIV. P. 67 14 CONCEPCION FLORES MOLINA, et al., (Doc. 10) 15 Defendants. 16 CONCEPCION FLORES MOLINA, Cross Claimant, v. LUPE C. NUNES, Cross Defendant.
Pending before the Court is the application of Interpleader Plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) for leave to deposit funds pursuant to Rule 67 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed January 11, 2024. (Doc. 10). No party has filed an opposition and because the time to do so has passed, the Court construes the motion is unopposed. See Local Rule 230(c) (“A failure to file a timely opposition may also be construed by the Court as a non-opposition to the motion.”). For the reasons set forth below, MetLife’s motion is granted. Background According to the…