Brittenham

Brittenham v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20241:23-cv-00401California1,552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBRA BRITTENHAM, Case No. 1:23-cv-00401-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED

APPLICATION TO EXTEND CASE

v. MANAGEMENT DATES

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., and DOES (Doc. 25) 1 through 50, inclusive, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO Defendants. SHOW CAUSE 16 (Doc. 27) 17 18 Pending before the Court is the unopposed application of Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Defendant), filed January 24, 2024, for Court order extending case management dates. (Doc. 25). Defendant seeks to continue all discovery and pretrial motion filing dates by six months and the pretrial conference and trial by eight months. Defendant’s application follows the parties’ earlier stipulation for order seeking the same requested extensions, filed January 18, 2024. (Doc. 21). In that stipulation, counsel for Plaintiff Debra Brittenham (Plaintiff) represented among other things that “due to unexpected circumstances that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.