(HC) Selck v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20242:21-cv-01499California759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:21-cv-01499-DAD-DMC (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

THIRD AMENDED HABEAS PETITION

Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 32, 33) 16 Petitioner Morrey Selck proceeds pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 16, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) be granted and this action be dismissed because petitioner’s third amended petition fails to comply with Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. (Doc. No. 33.) The magistrate judge also found that petitioner’s federal habeas petition should be dismissed as untimely because petitioner filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.