DiTomas

(PC) Birrell v. DiTomas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20242:22-cv-01834California492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, aka Bella- No. 2:22-CV-1834-KJM-DMC-P Christina Birrell, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 MICHELLE DiTOMAS, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. See ECF No. 27. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that a party may amend his or her pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days of serving the pleading or, if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, within 21 days after service of the responsive pleading, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), or within 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f) of the rules, whichever time is earlier, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). In all other situations, a party’s pleadings may only be amended upon leave of court or stipulation of all the parties. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.