(SS) Lee-Klein v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20242:19-cv-02335California3,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINA LEE-KLEIN, No. 2:19-CV-2335-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brought this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pending before the Court in this closed case are: (1) Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), ECF No. 27; and (2) Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), ECF No. 34. Defendant filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s counsel’s EAJA fees motion, ECF No. 32, and Plaintiff’s counsel filed a reply, ECF No. 33. Defendant has filed a notice of no objection to Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion under § 406(b), ECF No. 35. Plaintiff was provided notice of counsel’s § 406(b) motion and has not filed any response thereto. / / / / / / By way of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.