(SS) Medina v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20241:23-cv-00896California490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADLEY MEDINA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00896-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD

v. NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Docs. 5, 11) Defendant. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Bradley Medina (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1). On June 15, 2023, the Court issued a scheduling order setting forth the parties’ briefing deadlines. (Doc. 5). Further, the Court notified the parties “[v]iolations of this [scheduling] order or of the federal rules of procedure or the Local Rules may result in sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 110.” Id. at 3. On August 14, 2023, the Commissioner, complying with the Court’s scheduling order, timely lodged a copy of the administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.