(SS) Stamps v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20241:23-cv-00255California5,566 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

18 On February 18, 2023, Plaintiff Anne M. Stamps (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.2 25 26 1 On December 20, 2023, Martin O’Malley was named Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/history/commissioners.html. He is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in [their] official capacity, be the proper defendant.”). 1 On September 20, 2019, Plaintiff protectively filed a claim for SSI, alleging she became disabled on May 22, 2012, due to major depression, anxiety attacks, insomnia, memory issues, spine 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.