King

(PC) Mendiola v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20242:23-cv-01512California2,119 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERICK CHARLES MENDIOLA, No. 2:23-cv-01512 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. KING, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, an inmate at Mule Creek State Prison, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint filed on July 24, 2023, is before the court for screening. As set forth below, the complaint states a claim against defendants Celestine and King but does not state a claim against defendant Leau.1 Plaintiff is granted leave to amend. Within 30 days, plaintiff must inform the court how he will proceed. ////

1 Defendant Leau’s name is currently entered into the docket as “Leav”; if plaintiff states a cognizable claim against defendant Leau, the court will direct the Clerk of the Court to correct the spelling of the defendant’s name. I. In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff seeks to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.