(PC) Van Huisen v. United States of America
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:24-cv-0018 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On September 25, 2023, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On January 8, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. On January 12, 2024, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On January 30, 2024, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. Because plaintiff’s first amended complaint was superseded by the filing of his second amended complaint, the undersigned now screens plaintiff’s second amended complaint. As discussed below, it is recommended that plaintiff’s second amended complaint be dismissed as legally frivolous and without leave to amend. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or…