Lacy

Lacy v. Turner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20241:23-cv-01763California1,596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANICE LACY, Case No. 1:23-cv-01763-NODJ-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED TURNER, (ECF No. 1) Defendant. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ISSUE ONLY PRO SE INFORMATIONAL

ORDER THIRTY-DAY DEADLLINE 17 On December 26, 2023, Plaintiff Janice Lacy, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action. (ECF No. 1). Generally, Plaintiff seeks a temporary restraining order prohibiting Defendant, Sergeant Turner, from enforcing a California criminal protective order that requires Plaintiff to stay away from a property in Yokuts Valley, California. Because Plaintiff’s complaint implicates two doctrines—Younger abstention and Rooker-Feldman1—that prevent Federal courts from interfering with state court matters under certain circumstances, the Court will order Plaintiff to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.