(PC) Van Huisen v. Clinton Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-1596 DJC KJN P Plaintiff, (Ninth Circuit No. 24-0401) v. CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, et al., ORDER Defendants. 15 This matter is before the Court on referral from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 46.) The Ninth Circuit referred this matter back to the Court to determine if in forma pauperis status should continue for Plaintiff’s appeal of this Court’s order and judgment dismissing his amended complaint without leave to amend. (ECF Nos. 40, 41.) The Court finds Plaintiff's appeal to be frivolous and therefore orders his in forma pauperis status revoked. Plaintiff was originally granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis on August 16, 2023, in the initial screening order. (ECF No. 11.) The Magistrate Judge found Plaintiff’s original complaint against defendants Clinton Administration, William Clinton, Volkswagen, Inc. and Ed Corneilius, a Santa Clara Volkswagen…