(PC) Foote v. El Dorado Sheriff's Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20242:23-cv-00938California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN R. FOOTE, No. 2:23-cv-00938-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

EL DORADO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On October 30, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915A. ECF No. 11. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and granted 22 plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The 23 screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply could result in a recommendation that this 24 action be dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended 25 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or

1 Although it appears from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.