(SS) Wages v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20241:23-cv-00270California7,554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA KAY WAGES, Case No. 1:23-cv-00270-BAM Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of (Docs. 16, 18.) 15 Social Security,1 Defendant. 17

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Pamela Kay Wages (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties’ briefing on the motion was submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Docs. 16, 18, 19.)2 24

1 Martin O’Malley became the Commissioner of Social Security on December 20, 2023. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Martin O’Malley is substituted for Kilolo Kijakazi as Defendant in this suit. 2 The parties consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.