Covello

(PC) Rouser v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20242:21-cv-01396California797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ROUSER, Case No. 2:21-cv-01396-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING AS UNNECESSARY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO RESCIND

S. GYLES, et al., THE COURT’S ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

Defendants. IN FORMA PAUPERIS ECF No. 43 17 On May 15, 2023, I recommended that plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be revoked because he had run afoul of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)’s “Three Strikes Rule.” ECF No. 39. The District Judge adopted those recommendations and directed plaintiff to pay the required filing fee by October 6, 2023. ECF No. 40. When plaintiff failed to comply with that order, the court dismissed this action for plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. ECF No. 41. Several weeks later, defendants filed a motion to rescind the court’s order granting plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 43. Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.