CA Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING Case No. 2:21-cv-00073-JDP
PROTECTION ALLIANCE,
ORDER AFTER HEARING Plaintiff, 13 v.
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
COMPANY, Defendant. 17 This case was before the court on January 25, 2024, for hearing on plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order, ECF No. 85; third party Below the Blue’s (“BTB”) motion for partial reconsideration of the court’s November 13, 2023 order and for a protective order, ECF No. 98; and defendant’s motion to compel BTB’s compliance with court orders, ECF No. 138. Attorneys Matthew Maclear and Erica Maharg appeared for plaintiff; attorneys Peter Meier, Hariklia Karis, and Jonathan Kelley appeared for defendant; and attorney Joshua Koltun appeared for BTB. As explained below, the court defers ruling on plaintiff’s motion, denies BTB’s motion, and grants in part and denies in part defendant’s motion. I. Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order Plaintiff moves to modify…