Pliego

Pliego v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20241:23-cv-00858California678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARDO GARCIA PLIEGO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00858-NODJ-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE

v. DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL MOTION

DEADLINES

WALMART, INC. (Doc. 14) Defendant. 16 On April 27, 2023, Plaintiff Eduardo Garcia Pliego (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendant Walmart, Inc. (“Defendant”) in Kern County Superior Court. (Doc. 1). On June 5, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this Court. Id. The Court issued a scheduling order in this matter on August 31, 2023. (Doc. 10). Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated request for a four-month continuance of all discovery deadlines and pretrial motion filing dates. (Doc. 14). The parties request no change to the scheduled pretrial conference and trial dates. Id. Standard of Law District courts enter scheduling orders in actions to “limit the time to join other parties, amend the pleadings,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.