Haddad
(PC) Casey v. Haddad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-NODJ-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANTS AGATAR AND CASTILLO
v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS
ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE
HADDAD, et al., SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO
EFFECTUATE SERVICE
Defendants. 30-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Castillo, Castro and Fernandez, and failure to intervene claims against Defendants Agatar and Haddad. I. BACKGROUND Following screening of the first amended complaint, this Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate on January 22, 2024. (Doc. 30.) Service of Defendants Agatar, Castillo, Castro, Fernandez, and Haddad was to be effected under the Court’s e-service pilot…