Haddad

(PC) Casey v. Haddad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20241:21-cv-00855California941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-NODJ-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANTS AGATAR AND CASTILLO

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE

HADDAD, et al., SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO

EFFECTUATE SERVICE

Defendants. 30-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Castillo, Castro and Fernandez, and failure to intervene claims against Defendants Agatar and Haddad. I. BACKGROUND Following screening of the first amended complaint, this Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate on January 22, 2024. (Doc. 30.) Service of Defendants Agatar, Castillo, Castro, Fernandez, and Haddad was to be effected under the Court’s e-service pilot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.