Handian

Handian v. Shepard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20241:22-cv-01280California371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAROUT HANDIAN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01280-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE

DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS BY COURT

MARK SCOTT SHEPARD, et al., ORDERED DEADLINE

Defendants. (ECF No. 31)

DEADLINE: FEBRUARY 9, 2024 17 On January 25, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement of this action and requested that the Court grant Plaintiff until February 1, 2024 to file dispositional documents. (ECF No. 30.) The Court found good cause to set the deadline on February 1, 2024, as requested. (ECF No. 31.) The deadline to file dispositional documents has now expired and the parties have not done so, nor requested an extension of time from the Court. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions ……

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.