Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20241:23-cv-01214California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-1214 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ZACHERY JONES, et al. (Docs. 34, 37) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff asserts the defendants violated his civil rights during Plaintiff’s incarceration at North Kern State Prison and moved for summary judgment on his claims. (Doc. 34.) The magistrate judge found the motion was premature because the defendants have not filed a responsive brief and discovery has not been opened yet. (Doc. 37 at 2.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the motion be denied. (Id. at 3.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on the plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 37 at 3.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.