Farmbrough

(PC) Roberson v. Farmbrough

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20241:21-cv-00990California729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORRIS ROBINSON, No. 1:21-cv-00990-NODJ-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT LETICIA RAD CERNA

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT

TO RULE

J. FARMBROUGH, et al., (ECF No. 85) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Morris Robinson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants Fambrough, Johnson, Silva, Bedolla and Furlong for excessive force, failure to intervene claim against Defendants Cruz and Rodriguez, and deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Leticia Rad Cerna-previously identified by Plaintiff as Serna. However, Defendant Cerna has not been served with process. On February 1, 2024, the United States Marshal (USM) returned the summons unexecuted as to Defendant Cerna, noting that on January 18, 2024, he reached out to the Litigation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.