Bunton

Bunton v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20241:23-cv-00211California1,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN KARL RAY BUNTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00211-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER AUTHORIZING SERVICE OF

COMPLAINT AND FORWARDING

v. SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF

FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN

CITY OF MENDOTA POLICE CHIEF, et al., WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 23, 33, 34)

DEADLINE: 30 DAYS 17 18 19 On February 13, 2023, Plaintiff Benjamin Karl Ray Bunton (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The Court screened the complaint, determined it did not state a cognizable claim, and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) On March 27, 2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 12.) The FAC was screened and found to state cognizable claims under the First and Fourth Amendments against Defendants Renteria, Gonzalez, and the Police Chief. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.