Johal

(PC) Paschall v. Johal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20241:24-cv-00154California850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMAR PASCHALL, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00154-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE

DENIED

AMANDEEP JOHAL, et al., 30-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Lamar Paschall is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed his complaint and submitted an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) by a Prisoner on February 2, 2024. (Docs. 1, 2.) In his IFP application, Plaintiff states he is unable to pay the filing fee, is employed and earning 15 cents an hour, does not receive any money from a business, profession or self- employment, rent payments, interest or dividends, pensions, annuities or life insurance payments, disability or workers’ compensation payments, gifts or inheritance, or from “[a]ny other sources.” (Doc. 2 at 1-2.) Plaintiff also denies having any cash…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.