Castrejon

Gilbert v. Castrejon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20241:22-cv-00319California4,421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00319-SKO

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND Plaintiff, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES,

COSTS, AND LITIGATION EXPENSES

v. (Doc. 56) GABRIEL CASTREJON, et al.,

Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 17 On January 8, 2024, Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for attorney’s fees, costs, and litigation expenses (the “Motion”). (Doc. 56.) Defendants Gabriel Castrejon, doing business as El Marisquero (“Defendant Castrejon”); Ignacio Castrejon Alvarez, doing business as El Marisquero (“Defendant Alvarez”); and Guaranty Holdings of California, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose. (Doc. 57.) The parties have consented to conduct all proceedings in this action before the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (See Doc. 45.) The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.