(PS) Avilez-Urbina v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GIOVANELLA AVILEZ-URBINA, No. 2:23–cv–202–DAD–KJN PS Plaintiff, PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST COMPLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT. On June 29, 2023, the assigned district judge entered a scheduling order in this matter. (ECF No. 12.) Since then, plaintiff has elected to proceed without the aid of counsel, and the matter was reassigned to the undersigned and a different district judge. (ECF Nos. 13-23.) For clarity, the court now reissues a scheduling order, adopting most (but not all) of the previously-set dates.1 27 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 28 …