Bryan

United States v. Bryan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20242:22-cv-01962California352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:22-cv-01962 DJC AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARK LINN BRYAN, et al., Defendants. 16 The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against defendants Chase Manhattan Bank USA, NA (“Chase”) and Citibank South Dakota, NA (“Citibank”). ECF No. 126. Plaintiff included an affidavit of service with the motion stating that because the motion was filed through CM/ECF it was served upon “all parties who have appeared in this matter and are eligible to receive CM/ECF notices” and that notice was sent by mail to pro se litigant Mark Linn Bryan. ECF No. 126 at 10. Because the defaulting defendants have not appeared,1 they would not have received notice of the motion through CM/ECF and there is no indication that plaintiff otherwise notified

26 1 A Notice of Appearance was filed on behalf of these defendants on January 19, 2023 (ECF No. 33), but counsel was later granted permission to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.