CDCR

(PC) Muhammad v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20242:23-cv-00756California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KWESI MUHAMMAD, Case No. 2:23-cv-00756-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 On December 13, 2023, I granted defendant’s motion to dismiss in part and ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. ECF No. 11. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.