(PC) Bejarano v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20242:23-cv-01620California422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOB BEJARANO, Case No. 2:23-cv-01620-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 On November 2, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it did not state a cognizable claim. ECF No. 7. I granted him thirty days to file either an amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current one, subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. On December 12, 2024, I granted plaintiff an extension of time until January 2, 2024, to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 12. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.