Cantu

Cantu v. Kings County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20241:20-cv-00538California206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 ROGER CANTU, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00538-JLT-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE

12 KINGS COUNTY, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendants. (ECF No. 76) 14 On February 6, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 16 with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (ECF No. 76.) In light of the 17 stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson 18 v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice 19 and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 21 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41 (a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.