(PC) Mays v. Stanton Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20242:23-cv-02339California2,924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN TAYLOR MAYS, No. 2:23-cv-2339 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STANTON CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a Solano County jail inmate, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now before the court. Plaintiff’s allegations are essentially the same as he pled in his original complaint. As discussed below, plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed, and plaintiff is granted one final opportunity to file a pleading that states a cognizable civil rights claims. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.