Lopez

(PC) Rojas v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20242:22-cv-01977California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ROJAS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01977-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER

OR AMEND A JUDGMENT BE DENIED

E. LOPEZ, et al., ECF No. 40 Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 On January 23, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state a claim. ECF No. 13. I granted plaintiff leave to amend. Id. On February 24, 2023, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint, ECF No. 17, and, before I had the opportunity to screen that complaint, he filed a second, ECF No. 31. I screened the second amended complaint on June 12, 2023, and found that it again failed to state a cognizable claim. ECF No. 34. In the second screening order, I noted that plaintiff’s complaint, like his previous one, was difficult, if not impossible, to understand. Id. at 3. In it, plaintiff alleged that defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.