Unknown

(PC) Davis v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20242:23-cv-02358California314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DAVIS, No. 2:23-cv-2358 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed November 13, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 14.) On January 2, 2024, the court granted plaintiff a second thirty days extension of time to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 20.) Thirty days from January 2, 2024 have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.