(SS)Alvarado

(SS)Alvarado v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20241:22-cv-01198California3,813 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELISEO ALVARADO, Case No. 1:22-cv-01198-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY2

SECURITY,1 (Doc. Nos. 17, 21) Defendant. 17 Eliseo Alvarado (“Plaintiff”), seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the undersigned on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 17, 21). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denies Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, and remands the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.