(PC)Valdez

(PC)Valdez v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20241:23-cv-01729California1,012 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE LUIS VALDEZ JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-01729-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

CDCR, et al.,

MARCH 15, 2024 DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Jorge Luis Valdez Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. (Doc. Nos. 1, 12). Plaintiff acknowledges on the face of his Complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 1 at 3). Specifically, under the section of the form Complaint entitled “Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies” Plaintiff answers the question “Is the [grievance] process completed?” by stating “Yes and No” and indicates that two of the grievances concerning the incidents giving rise to the Complaint are still “pending.” (Id.). Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.