(PC)Foster

(PC)Foster v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20241:22-cv-00934California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY TYRONE FOSTER, No. 1:22-cv-0934 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND

DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

J. BURNES and T. CAMPBELL, CLOSE THE CASE Defendants. (Doc. 23) 16 Ricky Tyrone Foster screened seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights related to his time in a holding cell. The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and determined he did not state cognizable claims. (Doc. 23 at 5-12.) The magistrate judge observed that “[t]he The FAC essentially mirrors Plaintiff’s initial complaint and reasserts the same claims previously found to be deficient without remedying the defects that the Court identified in its original Screening Order.” (Id.) Given the failure to cure the identified deficiencies, the magistrate judge recommended the Frist…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.