Crowl

Smith v. Crowl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20241:23-cv-01474California318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD SMITH, No. 1:23-cv-01474-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION ROBERT B. CROWL, et al., (Doc. 6) Defendants. 16 17 On January 12, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that recommended this action be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 6.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has passed. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.