Hamman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN LAMAR PORTER, No. 1:23-cv-01468 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS VIVIAN HAMMAN, (Doc. 13) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant liable for violations of his rights arising under federal and state law. The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), and determined Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for retaliation and violating California’s Bane Act. (Doc. 8 at 3-5.) However, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff’s other claims were not cognizable. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff notified the Court that “it is his decision and intent to proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable….” (Doc. 11 at 2.) After receiving this notice, the magistrate judge recommended the action proceed only upon Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation and a violation of the Bane Act. (Doc. 13.) …