(PC) Van Huisen v. House of Representatives

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20242:24-cv-00246California1,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY S. VAN HUISEN, No. 2:24-cv-00246 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. On January 26, 2024, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 8.) On February 5, 2024, plaintiff filed a second motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 15.) The undersigned recommends that this motion be denied as unnecessary. On February 1, 2024, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) On February 5, 2024, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, docketed as “’First’ Amended Complaint.” (ECF No. 13.) Good cause appearing, the undersigned herein…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.